Speech and Language Delay in Children.

Childhood speech and language concerns are commonly encountered in the primary care setting. Family physicians are integral in the identification and initial evaluation of children with speech and language delays. Parental concerns and observations and milestone assessment aid in the identification of speech and language abnormalities. Concerning presentations at 24 months or older include speaking fewer than 50 words, incomprehensible speech, and notable speech and language deficits on age-specific testing. Validated screening tools that rely on parental reporting can serve as practical adjuncts during clinic evaluation. Early referral for additional evaluation can mitigate the development of long-term communication disorders and adverse effects on social and academic development. All children who have concerns for speech and language delays should be referred to speech language pathology and audiology for diagnostic and management purposes. Parents and caretakers may also self-refer to early intervention programs for evaluation and management of speech and language concerns in children younger than three years.

Exploring Language Development Support for Foster Children: A Scoping Review of Interventions for Foster Care Families.

PURPOSE: Children in foster care are at an increased risk for language delays and disorders, and foster parents can play a significant role in preventing delays in early language development. This scoping review explored empirical studies that included foster parent training programs for families with foster children under the age of 5 years. METHOD: Using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews), multiple databases were searched, and resulting article titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion in the review. Each study that met inclusion criteria was then coded for the training methods used to teach foster parents intervention strategies and the targeted outcomes of the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies were identified. Of the 24 studies reviewed, all included interventions focused on increasing parent-child relationships and decreasing child challenging behaviors, but few included opportunities for foster parents to practice using intervention strategies with their foster child. None of the studies focused specifically on strategies for promoting children's language development. When outcomes across the studies were reviewed, only two focused on children's language. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review point to the need for more research on language interventions that can be implemented by foster parents. The discussion focuses on the important role speech-language pathologists can play in the prevention of early language delays or disorders in young foster children. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21714311.

Assessment of Receptive and Expressive Language Skills Among Young Children With Prelingual Single-Sided Deafness Managed With Early Cochlear Implantation.

Importance: Pediatric single-sided deafness (SSD) can seriously affect development, causing impaired spatial hearing skills, speech-language delays, and academic underachievement. Early cochlear implantation likely improves hearing-related outcomes, but its association with language development remains unclear. Objective: To investigate whether early cochlear implantation is associated with language outcomes for children with prelingual SSD. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Cochlear Implant for Children and One Deaf Ear study was initiated in 2015 and recruited participants at 4 academic hospitals in Flanders, Belgium, through 2019. This cohort study included 3 groups of children aged 2 to 5 years: children with SSD and a cochlear implant, children with SSD without a cochlear implant, and a control group with normal hearing. Language and hearing skills were assessed 1 to 2 times per year until the age of 10 years. Study completion rates were high (82%). Data analysis was performed from October to December 2020. Exposure: Unilateral cochlear implant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Longitudinal vocabulary, grammar, and receptive language scores. The implanted group was hypothesized to outperform the nonimplanted group on all language tests. Results: During the recruitment period, 47 children with prelingual SSD without additional disabilities were identified at the participating hospitals. Fifteen of the 34 children with an intact auditory nerve received a cochlear implant (44%, convenience sample). Sixteen of the remaining children were enrolled in the SSD control group (50%). Data from 61 children (mean [SD] age at the time of enrollment, 2.08 [1.34] years; 26 girls [42%]) were included in the analysis: 15 children with SSD and a cochlear implant, 16 children with SSD without a cochlear implant, and 30 children with normal hearing. Children with SSD and a cochlear implant performed in line with their peers with normal hearing with regard to grammar. In contrast, children with SSD without a cochlear implant had worse grammar scores than the group with implants (-0.76; 95% CI, -0.31 to -1.21; P = .004) and the group with normal hearing (-0.53; 95% CI, -0.91 to -0.15; P = .02). The 3 groups had similar vocabulary and receptive language abilities. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that early cochlear implantation is associated with normal grammar development in young children with prelingual SSD. Although further follow-up will reveal the long-term outcomes of the cochlear implant for other skills, the current results will help clinicians and policy makers identify the best treatment option for these children.

Forum: Serving African American English Speakers in Schools Through Interprofessional Education & Practice.

Purpose African American English (AAE) speakers often face mismatches between home language and school language, coupled with negative attitudes toward AAE in the classroom. This forum, Serving African American English Speakers in Schools Through Interprofessional Education & Practice, will help researchers, parents, and school-based practitioners communicate in ways that are synergistic, collaborative, and transparent to improve educational outcomes of AAE speakers. Method The forum includes a tutorial offering readers instructions on how to engage in community-based participatory research (Holt, 2021). Through two clinical focus articles, readers will recognize how AAE develops during the preschool years and is expressed across various linguistic contexts and elicitation tasks (Newkirk-Turner & Green, 2021) and identify markers of developmental language disorder within AAE from language samples analyzed in Computerized Language Analysis (Overton et al., 2021). Seven empirical articles employ such designs as quantitative (Byrd & Brown, 2021; Diehm & Hendricks, 2021; Hendricks & Jimenez, 2021; Maher et al., 2021; Mahurin-Smith et al., 2021), qualitative (Hamilton & DeThorne, 2021), and mixed methods (Mills et al., 2021). These articles will help readers identify ways in which AAE affects how teachers view its speakers' language skills and communicative practices and relates to its speakers' literacy outcomes. Conclusion The goal of the forum is to make a lasting contribution to the discipline with a concentrated focus on how to assess and address communicative variation in the U.S. classroom.

An Integrative Review of Current Practice Models and/or Process of Family-Centered Early Intervention for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.

Over the past few decades, there has been an increasing shift toward emphasizing the importance of the child's family taking an active role in the habilitation process through family-centered early intervention (FCEI) programs. Accordingly, the Health Professions Council of South Africa recommends that early intervention services following confirmation of hearing loss must be family-centered within a community-based model of service delivery that is culturally congruent. The aim of this study was to explore and document current evidence reflecting trends in FCEI for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) by identifying and describing current practice models and/or processes of FCEI for these children. This study describes our first steps in formulating a framework for FCEI for children who are DHH in South Africa. An integrative literature review was conducted. Sage, Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies published in English between January 2009 and January 2019 reporting on FCEI programs for children who are DHH. Studies that focused on the following were excluded from the study: speech and language outcomes of children, youth, and adults who are DHH; education for children who are DHH; universal newborn hearing screening; professionals' roles in early hearing detection and intervention; diagnosis of hearing loss; and sign language. Kappa statistics were performed to determine agreement between reviewers. Twenty-two studies were included in the review. Cohen's kappa revealed a substantial agreement (κ = 0.8) between reviewers for data extraction and synthesis in terms of the articles that met the criteria for inclusion in the review. Findings were discussed under 5 themes: caregiver involvement; caregiver coaching/information sharing; caregiver satisfaction; challenges with FCEI; and telehealth. Generally, there is sufficient evidence for FCEI, with caregivers indicating the need for full involvement in their children's care. Methods of caregiver involvement involving caregiver coaching/information sharing need to be culturally and linguistically appropriate, with sensitivities around time and manner. This increases caregiver satisfaction with intervention programs and improves outcomes for children who are DHH. Challenges identified by the studies raise implications for early hearing detection and intervention programs, as well as Departments of Health and Social Welfare. These included logistical challenges, professional-related challenges, and caregiver-related challenges. Various aspects of FCEI have been reported in the review. Findings of these studies have significant implications for the formulation of quality FCEI programs to ensure contextually relevant and contextually responsive care of children who are DHH.

Influential factor combinations leading to language outcomes following a home visiting intervention: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA).

BACKGROUND: Children who experience adversity are more vulnerable to language difficulties. Early interventions beginning antenatally, such as home visiting, are provided to help prevent these problems. To improve the precision of early interventions, the impact of combinations of risk and protective factors over time must be explored and understood. There is, however, limited research investigating how such factors interact with intervention to change language outcomes over time. AIM: To explore the different paths that lead to Good and Poor language in a cohort of children experiencing adversity whose mothers received an optimal dose of the Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home visiting (MECSH) intervention over 2.5 years. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A total of 24 low socioeconomic status (SES) mothers experiencing adversity and their children who received more than half the scheduled dose of the MECSH intervention were followed over time: from before birth to school entry. Data were extracted from surveys and direct measurement over the study course. Child language outcome at school entry and the influence of seven key child, maternal and environmental factors, which have been shown in previous research to result in Good and Poor language outcomes, were explored through qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). QCA is a qualitative analytical technique that provides a deeper understanding of factor combinations influencing language development. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Multiple paths to Good (six paths) and Poor language (seven paths) were found. Paths with mostly protective factors resulted in Good language, except when maternal antenatal distress was present. Paths with two or more influential risks usually resulted in Poor language outcomes. When children experiencing adversity received the MECSH home visiting intervention, there was no one risk or protective factor necessary for Good or Poor language outcomes; however, there were clear patterns of factor combinations. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Mothers' antenatal psychological resources were a flag for future language concerns which can be used to improve the precision of the MECSH intervention. They were highly influential to their children's Good and Poor language outcomes by 5 years, when over time they were combined with characteristics such as early childhood education, poor maternal responsivity and/or the number of children in the home. Knowledge of early conditions associated with later Poor language can help clinicians identify and respond in preventative and promoting ways to improve language skills. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Children experiencing adversity are more vulnerable to language difficulties. Both risk for language difficulties and protection against them in this group are via a complex combination of factors. It is unknown how intervention works with these complex factors to result in Good and Poor language outcomes. What this paper adds to existing knowledge There are multiple paths to both Good and Poor language outcomes for children experiencing adversity. Mothers' psychological resources antenatally in combination with other key factors were particularly influential to Good and Poor language outcomes. What are the clinical implications of this work? In this study, maternal antenatal distress together with poor maternal responsivity were present in children's paths to Poor language outcomes at school entry. An extra focus on responsivity is required in antenatally distressed mothers of children experiencing adversity in early interventions. Children of mothers with good psychological resources antenatally who received home visiting intervention had Good language outcomes at 5 years when combined with 3 years or more of early childhood education and if there were one to two children in the home. Knowledge of these influences on language development can improve the precision of home visiting interventions and help clinicians tailor their visits to individual families' needs.

Supporting language development in Lebanese preschools: SLT and pre-KT practice and perception of roles.

BACKGROUND: Speech and language therapists (SLTs) are increasingly engaging in school-based interventions targeting children with language difficulties. Collaborative work between teachers and SLTs has shown to be beneficial in fostering language development in all children. Both groups of professionals have different but complementary roles in offering language support, according to children's needs. Effective collaboration between SLTs and teachers requires both parties to understand their roles and practices in schools. However, little is known about language support practices in Lebanese preschools and the roles of SLTs in these contexts. AIMS: (1) To explore the perceptions and reported practices among preschool teachers (pre-KTs) to support language development; (2) to investigate the current practices of SLTs in preschools; and (3) to understand pre-KTs' and SLTs' perceptions of the SLTs' role in Lebanese preschools. METHOD & PROCEDURES: Using a quantitative method, the study reports the results of two questionnaires (one for pre-KTs and one for SLTs) that were developed based on a review of the academic literature and adapted to the contextual realities. Questionnaires were completed in hard or soft copy by pre-KTs and through an online survey by SLTs. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: The questionnaires were completed by 1259 out of 1442 pre-KTs from 175 Lebanese preschools, and by 200 out of 391 SLTs from across Lebanon. First, the findings show that both professional groups recognize they have a role in supporting language development. Second, differences in reported practices were identified regarding language strategies for children with communication needs. In particular, pre-KTs reported less use of specific language strategies targeting children with language difficulties, while SLTs reported that their practices in schools remain primarily focused on children with communication needs. Finally, the analysis of perceptions showed a lack of acknowledgement of the SLTs' role in the prevention of communication and language disorders among all children. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This study provides an overview of the perceptions and reported practices of language development support in Lebanese preschools. The majority of SLTs and pre-KTs acknowledge their role in supporting language development. However, the slight differences in perceptions of SLT roles in prevention interventions highlight the necessity for SLTs to promote their active involvement in services targeting all children. Future research will investigate how SLTs are beginning to reconceptualize their role in intervention for preschool children. This will help to better define SLTs' roles and responsibilities in educational settings and foster effective professional collaboration. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Collaboration between teachers and SLTs has been shown to be beneficial in supporting language among all children. The way SLTs and pre-KTs view each other's roles could result in more effective professional collaboration. The SLT profession in Lebanon emerged about 20 years ago, yet SLTs are still struggling to define a framework for the scope of their practice in Lebanese preschools and to increase awareness of the relevance of their intervention in language. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The results revealed that there are major agreements between pre-KTs and SLTs concerning the support of language development in preschools. However, the findings highlight slight differences in the perception of the SLTs' role in the prevention of communication, language and literacy disorders in educational settings. It seems that their role is more commonly acknowledged for children with identified language and communication needs. Moreover, despite the strong agreement between both professionals on the role of the SLT to target all children, SLTs' practices in preschools are still mostly limited to meeting only referred and diagnosed needs in children. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study's findings contribute to a better understanding of the perceptions regarding the roles and practices of both groups of professionals in language development. The differences in how the SLTs' roles are perceived could lead to a more difficult implementation of collaborative language practices in preschools. It is therefore necessary to ensure a better understanding of the roles played by professionals, who could receive the relevant training in undergraduate education programmes. There is also a pressing need to provide a clearer definition of SLTs' roles in educational settings by reconceptualizing them into a preventive approach in collaboration with teachers.

The limitation of risk factors as a means of prognostication in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder of perinatal onset.

OBJECTIVE: The management of hearing loss due to auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) in neonates and infants is challenging because speech and language development prognosis cannot be directly inferred from early audiometric hearing thresholds. Consequently, appropriate intervention with hearing aids or cochlear implantation (CI) can be delayed. Our objective was to determine whether any features of patient history could be used to identify CI candidates with ANSD at an earlier age. METHOD: A database was maintained over 11 years to monitor cases of perinatal onset ANSD. Risk factors associated with the perinatal time period considered pertinent to hearing outcomes were assessed, including prematurity, birth weight, APGAR score, ototoxic drugs, and hyperbilirubinemia. Children with cochlear nerve aplasia and genetic mutations were excluded. Hearing outcome was determined according to mode of auditory rehabilitation beyond 30 months of age: A) no hearing device; B) hearing aid; C) CI. RESULTS: Of twenty-eight children with ANSD, nine (32%) had behavioural thresholds and language development sufficient to require no assistive device, 9 (32%) were fitted with hearing aids and 10 (36%) had CIs. The average age at CI (3.45 ± 2.07 years) was significantly older than the age at CI of other children in our program with prelingual hearing loss (2.05 ± 1.14 years; p = 0.01 Mann-Witney U Test). None of the putative risk factors for hearing loss reliably predicted the need for subsequent CI. CONCLUSION: The small sample size in this study is sufficient to confirm that clinical history alone does not reliably predict which young children with perinatal-onset ANSD will require CI. Consequently, timing for CI remains delayed in these children, potentially affecting speech and language outcome. The pathogenesis of perinatal-onset ANSD remains undetermined and novel means of assessment are required for prognostication in affected infants.

Atuação fonoaudiológica em projeto social: estudo preliminar / Speech-language hearing performance in social project: preliminary study / Actuación fonoaudiológica en proyecto social: estudio preliminar

Introdução: Pesquisas vêm demonstrando a importância dos primeiros anos de vida no desenvolvimento do cérebro. Quando a criança não apresenta o desenvolvimento de linguagem esperado, poderá ter prejuízo em aquisições. Desta forma, a identificação precoce de alterações evita consequências educacionais e sociais desfavoráveis. Objetivo: propor projeto de intervenção fonoaudiológica em instituição de acolhimento de crianças; levantar dados acerca da linguagem das crianças antes e depois da intervenção fonoaudiológica; possibilitar a superação de alterações da linguagem. Métodos: Observação das crianças, em sala de atividades coletivas, por meio do formulário de observação. Em seguida, foram selecionadas crianças com risco para alteração de linguagem e estas foram submetidas a avaliação por meio da Avaliação do Desenvolvimento da Linguagem (ADL) e Avaliação Fonológica da Criança (AFC). As crianças foram estimuladas durante 12 encontros semanais, em grupos, e depois foram reavaliadas. Os dados foram tabulados e analisados comparando-se as avaliações antes e depois da estimulação e relatando-se os dados obtidos pelos questionários respondidos pelas cuidadoras. Resultados: As quatro crianças - 3 meninos e 1 menina - que participaram do estudo tiveram melhora nas avaliações da linguagem após o período de estimulação, 3 modificaram o grau de gravidade do distúrbio de linguagem, e uma superou as alterações de linguagem - "desenvolvimento normal da linguagem" - após a reavaliação. Conclusão: Os relatos das cuidadoras e resultados das reavaliações demonstraram que as intervenções surtiram efeitos positivos e foram relevantes para as crianças, caracterizando uma boa proposta de intervenção coletiva fonoaudiológica.

Introduction: Research has shown the importance of early life in brain development. When the child does not have the expected language development, may have impairment in acquisitions. Thus, early identification of changes avoids unfavorable educational and social consequences. Objective: to propose a speech-language intervention project in a childcare institution; collect data about children's language before and after speech therapy intervention; enable overcoming language changes. Methods: Observation of children, in the collective activity room, through the observation form. Then, children at risk for language impairment were selected and were submitted to assessment through the Language Development Assessment (ADL) and the Child Phonological Assessment (CFA). The children were stimulated during 12 weekly group meetings and then reevaluated. Data were tabulated and analyzed by comparing the evaluations before and after stimulation and reporting the data obtained from the questionnaires answered by the caregivers. Results: The four children - 3 boys and 1 girl - who participated in the study had improved language assessments after the stimulation period, 3 modified the severity of the language disorder, and one outperformed the language disorders - "normal development of language "- after reevaluation. Conclusion: The caregivers' reports and reassessment results showed that the interventions had positive effects and were relevant for the children, characterizing a good proposal for collective speech therapy intervention.

Introducción: la investigación ha demostrado la importancia de la vida temprana en el desarrollo del cerebro. Cuando el niño no tiene el desarrollo del lenguaje esperado, puede tener un impedimento en las adquisiciones. Por lo tanto, la identificación temprana de los cambios evita consecuencias educativas y sociales desfavorables. Objetivo: proponer un proyecto de intervención de habla y lenguaje en una institución de cuidado infantil; recopilar datos sobre el lenguaje de los niños antes y después de la intervención de terapia del habla; permitir la superación de los cambios de idioma. Métodos: Observación de niños, en la sala de actividades colectivas, a través del formulario de observación. Luego, se seleccionaron los niños con riesgo de discapacidad del lenguaje y se los sometió a evaluación a través de la Evaluación del desarrollo del lenguaje (ADL) y la Evaluación fonológica del niño (AFC). Los niños fueron estimulados durante 12 reuniones grupales semanales y luego reevaluados. Los datos se tabularon y analizaron comparando las evaluaciones antes y después de la estimulación e informando los datos obtenidos de los cuestionarios respondidos por los cuidadores. Resultados: Los cuatro niños (3 niños y 1 niña) que participaron en el estudio mejoraron las evaluaciones del lenguaje después del período de estimulación, 3 modificaron la gravedad del trastorno del lenguaje y uno superó los trastornos del lenguaje: "desarrollo normal de lenguaje "- después de la reevaluación. Conclusión: Los informes de los cuidadores y los resultados de la reevaluación mostraron que las intervenciones tuvieron efectos positivos y fueron relevantes para los niños, caracterizando una buena propuesta para la intervención colectiva de terapia del habla.

Community-Based, Caregiver-Implemented Early Language Intervention in High-Risk Families: Lessons Learned.

BACKGROUND: High-quality, early caregiver-child interaction facilitates language, cognitive, and health outcomes. Children in low socioeconomic status households experience less frequent and lower-quality language interactions on average than their middle to high socioeconomic status peers. Early caregiver-implemented intervention may help to improve outcomes for these children. OBJECTIVES: This article describes how we used community-based participatory research (CBPR) to develop and implement a community-based, caregiver-implemented early language intervention, including the challenges, solutions, and lessons learned in the process of CBPR. METHODS: We adopted an ethnographic approach to document and analyze our CBPR experiences in multiple phases of the project, including intervention design, training, implementation, and evaluation. LESSONS LEARNED: Developing the CBPR partnership, co-designing and implementing the study, and managing systems- level concerns like obtaining funding were central challenges for the researcher-community team. CONCLUSIONS: The CBPR model enhances early language intervention research by facilitating understanding of families in underserved communities and increasing the cultural relevancy of intervention materials.

Safety and Effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation of Young Children, Including Those With Complicating Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Determine safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation of children under age 37 months, including below age 12 months. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care children's medical center. PATIENTS: 219 children implanted before age 37 mos; 39 implanted below age 12 mos and 180 ages 12-36 mos. Mean age CI = 20.9 mos overall; 9.4 mos (5.9-11.8) and 23.4 mos (12.1-36.8) for the two age groups, respectively. All but two ≤12 mos (94.9%) received bilateral implants as did 70.5% of older group. Mean follow-up = 5.8 yrs; age last follow-up = 7.5 yrs, with no difference between groups. INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical and anesthesia complications, measurable open-set speech discrimination, primary communication mode(s). RESULTS: Few surgical complications occurred, with no difference by age group. No major anesthetic morbidity occurred, with no critical events requiring intervention in the younger group while 4 older children experienced desaturations or bradycardia/hypotension. Children implanted under 12 mos developed open-set earlier (3.3 yrs vs 4.3 yrs, p ≤ 0.001) and were more likely to develop oral-only communication (88.2% vs 48.8%, p ≤ 0.001). A significant decline in rate of oral-only communication was present if implanted over 24 months, especially when comparing children with and without additional conditions associated with language delay (8.3% and 35%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of children under 37 months of age can be done safely, including those below age 12 mos. Implantation below 12 mos is positively associated with earlier open-set ability and oral-only communication. Children implanted after age 24 months were much less likely to use oral communication exclusively, especially those with complex medical history or additional conditions associated with language delay.

Providing Supportive Hospital Environments to Promote the Language Development of Infants and Children Born Prematurely: Insights From Neuroscience.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid neural development occurs beginning in utero and extending throughout a child's first years of life, shaped by environmental input, which is essential for language learning. If this development is disrupted by premature birth and/or related repeated hospitalizations, atypical language development may result even in the absence of severe neurologic damage. METHOD: This narrative review describes typical neurodevelopment associated with language and the atypical neurodevelopment often experienced by children born prematurely that can adversely affect their language development. RESULTS: We describe evidence-based intervention strategies applicable in the hospital setting that can support the language development of young children who are born prematurely. DISCUSSION: To promote neurodevelopmental growth that will support language learning, children born prematurely need to engage in supportive interactions with others. Awareness of evidence-based strategies can equip health care staff to provide a supportive hospital environment to promote the language development of children born premature.

Neuronal Development of Hearing and Language: Cochlear Implants and Critical Periods.

The modern cochlear implant (CI) is the most successful neural prosthesis developed to date. CIs provide hearing to the profoundly hearing impaired and allow the acquisition of spoken language in children born deaf. Results from studies enabled by the CI have provided new insights into (a) minimal representations at the periphery for speech reception, (b) brain mechanisms for decoding speech presented in quiet and in acoustically adverse conditions, (c) the developmental neuroscience of language and hearing, and (d) the mechanisms and time courses of intramodal and cross-modal plasticity. Additionally, the results have underscored the interconnectedness of brain functions and the importance of top-down processes in perception and learning. The findings are described in this review with emphasis on the developing brain and the acquisition of hearing and spoken language.

Uso del Inventario de Habilidades Comunicativas de MacArthur-Bates con lactantes en riesgo de daño cerebral / Use of the MacArthur-Bates-Communicative-Inventory with infants at risk of brain damage

Introducción. Existen escasas pruebas conductuales validadas para hispanoparlantes que incluyen dentro de sus normas lactantes normo-oyentes con riesgo de daño cerebral perinatal. Sin medidas conductuales validadas, los clínicos usan pruebas que no están normadas para esta población, como el Inventario de Habilidades Comunicativas MacArthur-Bates (SCDI). Estudios electrofisiológicos han mostrado que las subpruebas comprensión y producción de palabras de dicho inventario tienen un alto poder discriminante en estas poblaciones en riesgo cuando se ajusta la norma de la prueba al percentil 50. Se examinó dicha norma ajustada en la práctica clínica. Método. Diseño de un solo grupo y selección de la muestra semialeatoria. Se seleccionaron 30 niños con factores de riesgo de daño cerebral perinatal de la Unidad de investigación en Neurodesarrollo a los que se les hubiera aplicado el inventario al año de edad y la Escala de Lenguaje Preescolar (PLS-5) entre los 3 y 4 años. Se comparó la proporción de niños identificados con alteraciones en el desarrollo del lenguaje por la PLS-5 entre los 3-4 años con la proporción de niños identificados con riesgo por el SCDI al año de edad usando la norma sin ajustar y la norma ajustada. Resultados. La norma ajustada del SCDI permitió identificar una proporción de niños con riesgo del lenguaje al año de edad similar a la proporción que se identificó con alteraciones entre los 3 y 4 años. Conclusión. Debería considerarse una norma ajustada cuando se examinen poblaciones con riesgo de daño cerebral usando el Inventario SCDI al año de edad

Introduction. There are few validated language test for Spanish speakers that cover normo-listeners infants at risk of brain damage. Without validated behavioural measures, clinicians use test that are not standardised for this population, such as the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Skills Inventory (SCDI). Electrophysiological studies have shown that the comprehension and word production sub-test of such inventory have high discriminatory power in these at-risk populations when the test standard is adjusted to the 50th percentile. This adjusted standard was examined in clinical practice. Methods. Design of a single group and selection of the semi-random sample. We selected 30 infants at risk of brain damage from the Neurodevelopment Research Unit to which the Inventory at one year old and the Preschool Language Scale (PLS-5) were applied between the ages of 3 and 4 years. We compared the proportion of children identified with language developmental impairments by PLS-5 between the ages of 3-4 with the proportion of children identified at risk by SCDI at one year of age using the non-adjusted norm and adjusted norm. Results. The adjusted SCDI standard allowed the identification of a proportion of infants at risk of brain damage and also at risk of language development impairments at one year of age, similar to the proportion that was identified with impairments between 3 and 4 years. Conclusion. An adjusted norm should be considered when examining infants at risk of brain damage using the SCDI Inventory at one year of age

Longitudinal vocabulary development in Australian urban Aboriginal children: Protective and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Vocabulary is a key component of language that can impact on children's future literacy and communication. The gap between Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children's reading and academic outcomes is well reported and similar to Indigenous/non-Indigenous gaps in other nations. Determining factors that influence vocabulary acquisition over time and may be responsive to treatment is important for improving Aboriginal children's communication and academic outcomes. AIM: To determine what factors influence Australian urban Aboriginal children's receptive vocabulary acquisition and whether any of these are risks or protective for vocabulary development. METHOD: One hundred thirteen Aboriginal children in South Western Sydney from the longitudinal birth cohort Gudaga study were assessed on The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test multiple times: 3 years, just prior to school entry, at the end of the first and second years of formal schooling. Multilevel models were used to determine the effects of 13 fixed and manipulable maternal, child, and family variables drawn from previous research. RESULTS: Higher maternal education was found to be protective at 3 years and over time. The number of children in urban Australian Aboriginal households made an impact on vocabulary development and this varied over time. From 3 to 6 years, those with early poor non-verbal cognitive skills had vocabulary skills that remained below those with stronger non-verbal skills at 3 years. Girls exhibit an earlier advantage in vocabulary acquisition, but this difference is not sustained after 4 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: The risk and protective factors for vocabulary development in Australian Aboriginal children are similar to those identified in other studies with some variation related to the number of children in the home. In this limited set of predictors, maternal education, gender, non-verbal cognitive skills, and the number of children in households were all shown to impact on the acquisition of vocabulary to 3 years and or the developmental trajectory over time.

Influencia de los hábitos de sueño en el desarrollo del lenguaje en preescolares / Influence of sleep habits in the language development in preschoolers

Introducción: la adquisición del lenguaje ha demostrado ser particularmente vulnerable a la organización del estado vigilia-sueño.Objetivo: identificar factores de riesgo en los hábitos y características del sueño, asociados al retardo primario del lenguaje en preescolares.Métodos: estudio analítico, caso-control, longitudinal prospectivo de 73 niños entre 2 y 5 años, que acudieron a consulta de Neuropediatría del Hospital Pediátrico Juan Manuel Márquez, por retardo del lenguaje, entre enero de 2010 y enero de 2014, en relación con un grupo control de niños sanos.Resultados: en el retardo primario del lenguaje se demuestra menor número de horas de sueño nocturno (p< 0,0001), mayor número de horas de siesta (p< 0,0001), mayor frecuencia de despertares en la noche (p= 0,003), menor hábito de juego en grupo (p< 0,0001), mayor hábito de ver televisión antes del sueño (p< 0,0001), mayor presencia de medios electrónicos en la habitación del niño (p< 0,0001), cambio a la cama de los padres (p= 0,01); y son más frecuentes la enuresis (p= 0,04) y los terrores nocturnos (p= 0,01).Conclusiones: los factores de riesgo identificados fueron: sueño nocturno inferior a 10 h, siestas prolongadas por más de 2 h, despertares frecuentes en la noche, hábito de ver televisión durante el sueño y/o televisor en las habitaciones, y cambio de cama durante la noche(AU)

Introduction: the acquisition of language has proved to be particularly vulnerable to the organization of the awake-sleep state.Objective: to identify those risk factors in sleep characteristics and habits associated to the primary retardation of language in preschoolers.Methods: prospective, longitudinal, case-control and analytical study of 73 children aged 2 to 5 years, who went to the neuropediatric service of Juan Manuel Márquez pediatric hospital because of language retardation from January 2010 to January 2014 and comparison with a control group of healthy children.Results: in the primary retardation of language, there have been found lower number of night sleep hours (p< 0.0001), higher number of nap hours (p< 0.0001), more frequent night awakenings (p= 0.003), lesser habit of playing in team (p< 0.0001), more frequent habit of TV viewing before going to sleep (p< 0.0001), more presence of electronic devices in the child´s room (p< 0.0001), moving to the parent´s bed (p= 0.01), and more frequent nocturnal enuresis (p< 0.04) and fears (p= 0.01).Conclusions: the identified risk factors were night sleep for less than 10 hours, over 2 hour naps, frequent nocturnal awakenings, habit of TV viewing before sleeping and/or presence of TV sets in bedrooms and moving to the parents´ bed during the night(AU)

The effect of age of cochlear implantation on vocal characteristics in children.

BACKGROUND: Early cochlear implantation aids auditory feedback and supports better communication and self-monitoring of the voice. The objective of this study was to determine whether the age of cochlear implantation has an impact on vocal development in children implanted before age 4. METHOD AND PROCEDURES: The study consisted of 19 participants in total. All implant recipients (experimental group) were 3-5 years post-implantation, including four prelingual (0-2 years) and five perilingual (2-4 years) implant recipients. The control group consisted of 10 children whose hearing was within normal limits between the ages 3-6 years and 10 months, which was compared to the experimental group. Established paediatric norms were used for additional comparison. A questionnaire was used to gather information from each of the participant's caregivers to determine whether other personal and contextual factors had an impact on voice production. An acoustic analysis was conducted for each participant using the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program of the Computerized Speech Lab. RESULTS: When the experimental group and the control group were compared, similar results were yielded for fundamental frequency and short-term perturbation (jitter and shimmer). More variability was noted in long-term frequency and amplitude measures, with significantly higher differences, and therefore further outside the norms, in the prelingual group when compared to the perilingual and control groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, age of implantation did not impact vocal characteristics. Further research should include larger sample sizes, with participants that are age and gender matched.